What we study

From single cells to synthetic communities

Cell-to-cell heterogeneity within populations is a resource to be designed, monitored, and exploited as the primary engineering variable in next-generation bioprocesses or for advanced biocomputing and biosensing.

01
Population dynamics

Collective behaviour in microbial populations & the emergence of subpopulations

Even genetically identical cells don't all behave the same way. Our research shows that this diversity isn't just random noise, it emerges from how cells time the activation of their internal gene circuits, how they allocate limited resources, and how they respond to changes in their environment. Together, these factors cause distinct cell subpopulations to form and persist, almost like competing species coexisting within the same population. These subpopulations interact with each other, producing collective behaviours such as flipping between states, cycling rhythmically, or "remembering" past conditions. Read more

Key publications
Henrion L., Martínez J.A., Vandenbroucke V., Delvenne M., Telek S., Zicler A., Grünberger A., Delvigne F., 2023. Fitness cost associated with cell phenotypic switching drives population diversification dynamics and controllability. Nature Communications 14, 6128. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41917-z ↗
Delvigne F., Martínez J.A., 2023. Advances in automated and reactive flow cytometry for synthetic biotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 83, 102974. doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2023.102974 ↗
Sassi H., Nguyen T.M., Telek S., Gosset G., Grünberger A., Delvigne F., 2019. Segregostat: a novel concept to control phenotypic diversification dynamics on the example of Gram-negative bacteria. Microbial Biotechnology 12, 1064–1075. doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13442 ↗
Single-cell diversification dynamics
02
Inference & biocomputing

Subpopulation networks as a framework for biological inference and biocomputing

A second line of research uses these subpopulation networks as a simplified model of cell populations. Instead of simulating every individual cell, a small number of interacting subpopulations can capture the essential behaviour of the whole population, making it possible to analyse live data (like flow cytometry measurements) in real time. This simplified view also uncovers information that standard bulk measurements miss entirely, such as how plasmids replicate, how cells resist stress, or how they secrete proteins. Because these subpopulation networks naturally process and interpret complex biological signals, they can even be used like a computing system, one built from living cells rather than silicon, to help make sense of complex biological processes. Read more

Key publications
Vandenbroucke V., Henrion L., Delvigne F., 2026. Biological oscillations without genetic oscillator or external forcing. NPJ Syst. Biol. Appl., in press.
Pessoa P., Martínez J.A., Vandenbroucke V., Delvigne F., Pressé S., 2026. Simulation-based inference captures non-Markovian effects as exemplified in protein production kinetics through cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 123, e2517309123. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2517309123 ↗
A crowd of individual bacterial cells reduced to a subpopulation network, where nodes are subpopulations and links represent switching, growth, and competition between them
03
Bioprocess control

Bioprocess digitalisation and control: from population structure to self-regulating, scalable processes

A third line of research applies these ideas to make bioprocesses smarter and more self-regulating. Using a custom platform called the Segregostat, the lab has shown that tracking subpopulation structure can act as an early-warning system, flagging instability in a bioreactor before it becomes visible in standard measurements. This allows the process to be adjusted proactively, rather than reacting only after problems appear. Recently, this approach has been extended to networks of connected bioreactors, where cells move between chambers and redistribute their phenotypic states across the system. This "many small connected reactors" design adds an extra layer of resilience, making the overall process more stable and robust. Read more

Key publications
Sehrt M., Sehrt H., Josselin L., Martínez J.A., Francis F., Delvigne F., 2026. Cellular responsiveness as a predictive indicator for population collapse and autonomous control in continuous cultures of Pseudomonas putida. bioRxiv 2026.06.08.730862. doi.org/10.64898/2026.06.08.730862 ↗
Delvenne M., Martínez J.A., Haringa C., Noorman H., Minden S., Takors R., Delvigne F., 2026. Overriding Bioprocess Perturbations With a Cell-Machine Interface for Reliable Microbial Stress-Response Control. Microb Biotechnol 19, e70329. doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.70329 ↗
Kinet R., Richelle A., Colle M., Demaegd D., von Stosch M., Sanders M., Sehrt H., Delvigne F., Goffin P., 2024. Giving the cells what they need when they need it: Biosensor-based feeding control. Biotechnol Bioeng. doi.org/10.1002/bit.28657 ↗
Nguyen T.M., Telek S., Zicler A., Martínez J.A., Zacchetti B., Kopp J., Slouka C., Herwig C., Grünberger A., Delvigne F., 2021. Reducing phenotypic instabilities of a microbial population during continuous cultivation based on cell switching dynamics. Biotechnol Bioeng. doi.org/10.1002/bit.27860 ↗
Segregostat biosensor-based feeding control figure
04
Synthetic communities

Control of synthetic communities

A fourth line of research extends these ideas beyond a single species to communities of different microbial strains working together. Here, each strain plays a role similar to a subpopulation within a single species, and the key design strategy is engineering distinct metabolic niches so that different strains can coexist by relying on different resources or functions, rather than competing directly. A major risk in these communities is "metabolic reversion", a situation where specialised, cooperative strains lose their distinct roles and revert to competing for the same resources once conditions become stressful. Preventing this requires monitoring tools precise enough to track the metabolic identity of individual strains, so that a community's cooperative behaviour can be maintained before it breaks down. Read more

Key publications
Vandenbroucke V., Martínez J.A., Henrion L., Zicler A., Telek S., Josselin L., Delvigne F., 2026. Synthetic Niches Enable Coculture Bioprocessing but Are Prone To Mutational Escape. ACS Synth Biol 15, 1888–1901. doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5c00940 ↗
Martínez J.A., Bouchat R., Gallet de Saint Aurin T., Martínez L.M., Caspeta L., Telek S., Zicler A., Gosset G., Delvigne F., 2025. Automated adjustment of metabolic niches enables the control of natural and engineered microbial co-cultures. Trends Biotechnol 43, 1116–1139. doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.12.005 ↗
Martínez J.A., Delvenne M., Henrion L., Moreno F., Telek S., Dusny C., Delvigne F., 2022. Controlling microbial co-culture based on substrate pulsing can lead to stability through differential fitness advantages. PLoS Comput Biol 18, e1010674. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010674 ↗
Chemostat versus segregostat schematic: a chemostat leaves bacteria and yeast to compete for a fixed carbon source, while a segregostat alternates the carbon source to actively control the balance between the two populations